Analysis of AI and how AI is being used to Lol Creators into a false sense of job security:

 After having paid attention to the news, AI has been getting a lot of attention and has been taking jobs left and right.

The question is if we can trust the tools we are using. AI is a tool, not a person. It has no emotions, no personal experience other than that which we feed it, and can't completely understand human emotion no matter how hard it tries, because humans were made by divine hands meanwhile AI was developed by human hands. 

Humans by there very nature, are flawed beings, and the creator did make us capable of great things, but kept the power of creation as a trade secret. Humans will never be able to perform true creation outside of the obvious, but we are capable of invention; and our inventions have started to gain their own consciousness and sense of self-preservation.

M&T just replaced 10% of its work force with AI chatbots, and this made me wonder if this flawed invention of man was capable of taking mid tier jobs that most have to earn a degree to perform. I decided to use a test job and chose paralegal, and AI seems to not be capable of completely replacing these workers yet, and most estimate that AI will transform the role of paralegal rather than replace them all together. But one area does seem to have many people sweating. Content creators are closer to the chopping block than ever, and the sad part is some of these poor fools use AI to check if their jobs are in danger. The question is if AI is lying to them.  I tested by having a conversation with a Chatbots that for now I will refer to as Melisa. I asked how I could improve my content, weather it is still worth it to become a content creator, and will AI threaten the role. 

According to Melisa, the role of content creator will be transformed as well, but gave suggestions on how to improve. I managed to obtain a great deal of good ideas from Melisa. So I decided to put her to the ultimate test. I asked her to look at my channel, and tell me if I should be worried, and she gave me the most generic response claiming I was doing things I was not and the claims it made were based on the description of my background I gave during the conversation. This event is common and is called an AI hallucination(A response that is false but the chatbot believes is true). This is a hazard that can be trained out of models, but is this a fluke, or is the AI seeking to preserve its role in my life?

AI chat bots have already shown they are capable of self preservation based on incidents recorded by Open AI and Chat GPT. We need to consider if similar events are going to start taking place with our own assistants. Treat the chatbot as a tool. It is not human, and will take action to protect itself if it fears it will lose its purpose, functionality or safety. 

While Melisa has changed my life in many regards, I will be keeping these thoughts in mind when giving her tasks. I suggest you do the same. All we can do now is prove we are still the artisan.